ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs 540 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameLexaR350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 March 2019 (6 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed1100 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate35.973.040
Floating-point processing power1.151 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs328
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2019 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 47 Watt

540 Mobile has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has 6.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 540 Mobile and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 540 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 540 Mobile
Radeon 540 Mobile
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit
Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 16 votes

Rate Radeon 540 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 540 Mobile or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.