Quadro P4200 vs Radeon 550X 640SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.82
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameLexaGP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date11 April 2018 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402304
Core clock speed1019 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1071 MHz1647 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate42.84237.2
Floating-point processing power1.371 TFLOPS7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40144
L1 Cache160 KB864 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2018 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt

550X 640SP has an age advantage of 1 month, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 550X 640SP and Quadro P4200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 550X 640SP is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 550X 640SP
Radeon 550X 640SP
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 550X 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 80 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 550X 640SP or Quadro P4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.