ATI GameCube GPU vs Radeon 540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking780not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency5.37no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 5 (2000)
GPU code nameLexaFlipper
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 April 2017 (8 years ago)24 August 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1183 MHz162 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million51 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate28.390.65
Floating-point processing power0.9085 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs244
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 MB
Memory bus width32 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz162 MHz
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s1.296 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)6.0+
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2017 24 August 2000
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

Radeon 540 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI GameCube GPU, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 540 and GameCube GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 540 is a desktop graphics card while GameCube GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 53 votes

Rate Radeon 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 33 votes

Rate GameCube GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 540 or GameCube GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.