Quadro P3000 Max-Q vs Radeon 530

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking810not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.66no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameWestonN17E-Q1 Max-Q
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speed730 MHz1075 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz1240 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate24.58no data
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 1 September 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 60 Watt

Radeon 530 has 20% lower power consumption.

P3000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 530 and Quadro P3000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 530 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 530
Radeon 530
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 714 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.