GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon 530

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	780	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.57	no data
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code name	Meso	NV18 C1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	21 March 2017 (7 years ago)	6 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$69.99
Current price	$627	$103 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	250 MHz
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,550 million	29 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	24.50	1.000
Floating-point performance	784.1 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 530 and GeForce FX 5200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3/GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	6.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0	8.0
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.5	1.3
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	+	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	21 March 2017	6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	150 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---