GeForce 8700M GT SLI vs Radeon 530

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 530 and GeForce 8700M GT SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 530
2017
4 GB DDR3/GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.65
+235%

530 outperforms 8700M GT SLI by a whopping 235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8101145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.660.94
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)G8x (2007)
GPU code nameWestonNB8E-SE
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)18 September 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38464
Core clock speed730 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million578 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt58 Watt
Texture fill rate24.58no data
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 530 2.65
+235%
8700M GT SLI 0.79

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 530 6338
+189%
8700M GT SLI 2196

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+275%
4−5
−275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
+220%
5−6
−220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 10 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+250%
10−11
−250%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Metro Exodus 13
+333%
3−4
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+200%
6−7
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+22.6%
30−35
−22.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 32
+256%
9−10
−256%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Metro Exodus 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+22.6%
30−35
−22.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+22.6%
30−35
−22.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how Radeon 530 and 8700M GT SLI compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 530 is 275% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 530 is 1100% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 8700M GT SLI is 67% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 530 is ahead in 33 tests (94%)
  • 8700M GT SLI is ahead in 1 test (3%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.65 0.79
Recency 18 April 2017 18 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 58 Watt

Radeon 530 has a 235.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 16% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 530 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 530
Radeon 530
NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
GeForce 8700M GT SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 714 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.