Radeon RX 7400 vs RTX PRO 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.57no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGB202Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2025 (recently)8 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240641792
Core clock speed2017 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed2407 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors92,200 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate1,810257.6
Floating-point processing power115.8 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs17664
TMUs752112
Tensor Cores752no data
Ray Tracing Cores18828

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length304 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount96 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.79 TB/s288.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1b1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA10.1-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 96 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 43 Watt

RTX PRO 6000 has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

RX 7400, on the other hand, has 1295.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX PRO 6000 and Radeon RX 7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 53 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 6000 or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.