Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell with Radeon RX 9070 GRE, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025
48 GB GDDR7, 300 Watt
78.04
+34.5%

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell outperforms 9070 GRE by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1046
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.04
Power efficiency19.9820.26
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGB202Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 March 2025 (1 year ago)8 May 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140803072
Core clock speed1740 MHz1420 MHz
Boost clock speed2377 MHz2790 MHz
Number of transistors92,200 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate1,045.9535.7
Floating-point processing power66.94 TFLOPS34.28 TFLOPS
ROPs17696
TMUs440192
Tensor Cores44096
Ray Tracing Cores11048
L0 Cacheno data768 KB
L1 Cache13.8 MBno data
L2 Cache96 MB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.34 TB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1b1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA12.0-
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 78.04
+34.5%
RX 9070 GRE 58.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 32301
+34.4%
Samples: 52
RX 9070 GRE 24025
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD210−220
+31.3%
160
−31.3%
1440p110−120
+29.4%
85
−29.4%
4K75−80
+31.6%
57
−31.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.43
1440pno data6.46
4Kno data9.63

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 364
+0%
364
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 197
+0%
197
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113
+0%
113
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and RX 9070 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 31% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 29% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 32% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 78.04 58.04
Recency 18 March 2025 8 May 2025
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 220 Watt

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has a 34% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 9070 GRE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 36% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 9070 GRE in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9070 GRE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 378 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 113 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell or Radeon RX 9070 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.