Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO 2000 Blackwell PRO 4000 Blackwell PRO 4500 Blackwell PRO 5000 Blackwell PRO 6000 PRO 6000 Blackwell PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell with Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025
16 GB GDDR7, 70 Watt
34.28
+275%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 275% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency37.31no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGB206Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores435296
Core clock speed790 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1950 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate265.2no data
Floating-point processing power16.97 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs136no data
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8no data
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7DDR4
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1125 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1bno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.4-
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 42 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.28 9.13
Recency 11 August 2025 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 275.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
GT 720 OEM GT 720 OEM
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
GT 720 OEM GT 720 OEM
GT 720 OEM GT 720 OEM
vs
RX 7400 RX 7400
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
GT 720 OEM GT 720 OEM
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX 7400 RX 7400
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
vs
RX 7400 RX 7400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.