Radeon R9 380X vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell with Radeon R9 380X, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025
16 GB GDDR7, 70 Watt
34.28
+134%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell outperforms R9 380X by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.95
Power efficiency37.315.88
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGB206Antigua
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)19 November 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43522048
Compute unitsno data32
Core clock speed790 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1950 MHz970 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate265.2124.2
Floating-point processing power16.97 TFLOPS3.973 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs136128
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length167 mm221 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone​2 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data-
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz970 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s182.4 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.86.3
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.4+
Mantle-+
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 34.28
+134%
R9 380X 14.66

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 14363
+134%
R9 380X 6145

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.28 14.66
Recency 11 August 2025 19 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 190 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 133.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 380X in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 380X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
AMD Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 213 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or Radeon R9 380X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.