HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell with HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025
16 GB GDDR7, 70 Watt
34.28
+8062%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell outperforms HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) by a whopping 8062% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1621295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency37.31no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)Gen. 8 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGB206Braswell
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)1 April 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores435212
Core clock speed790 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate265.2no data
Floating-point processing power16.97 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs136no data
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8no data
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1bno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.4-
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD650−700
+8025%
8
−8025%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
God of War 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
God of War 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
God of War 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
God of War 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 8025% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 30 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.28 0.42
Recency 11 August 2025 1 April 2016
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 8061.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 254 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.