GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell with GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025
16 GB GDDR7, 70 Watt
34.28
+90.9%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell outperforms GTX 1060 Mobile by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.08
Power efficiency37.3117.10
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGB206GP106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)15 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$237.11

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43521280
Core clock speed790 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1708 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt80 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data94 °C
Texture fill rate265.2133.6
Floating-point processing power16.97 TFLOPS4.275 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs13680
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1bDP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDCP-2.2
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GPU Boostno data3.0
VR Readyno data+
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.41.2.131
CUDA12.0+
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+76.5%
68
−76.5%
1440p85−90
+88.9%
45
−88.9%
4K55−60
+83.3%
30
−83.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.49
1440pno data5.27
4Kno data7.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 137
+0%
137
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+0%
37
+0%
God of War 53
+0%
53
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Fortnite 177
+0%
177
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
God of War 43
+0%
43
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 78
+0%
78
+0%
Valorant 136
+0%
136
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 222
+0%
222
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Fortnite 105
+0%
105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
God of War 34
+0%
34
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+0%
74
+0%
Metro Exodus 40
+0%
40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 67
+0%
67
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
+0%
69
+0%
Valorant 134
+0%
134
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 71
+0%
71
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 64
+0%
64
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 71
+0%
71
+0%
God of War 24
+0%
24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
+0%
52
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Valorant 72
+0%
72
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 81
+0%
81
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 133
+0%
133
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+0%
57
+0%
God of War 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50
+0%
50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14
+0%
14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%
Valorant 117
+0%
117
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+0%
35
+0%
God of War 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+0%
17
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 23
+0%
23
+0%

This is how RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and GTX 1060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 76% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 89% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 83% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.28 17.96
Recency 11 August 2025 15 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 80 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 90.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 628 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.