Radeon RX 7400 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile with Radeon RX 7400, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025
8 GB GDDR7, 45 Watt
33.61
+22.7%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms RX 7400 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking158224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency60.4951.61
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGB206Navi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)8 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33281792
Core clock speed952 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate151.3257.6
Floating-point processing power9.684 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs104112
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores2628
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache3.3 MB512 KB
L2 Cache32 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130
+30%
100−110
−30%
1440p69
+25.5%
55−60
−25.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+25%
160−170
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+26%
100−105
−26%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+25%
160−170
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+27.8%
90−95
−27.8%
Fortnite 150−160
+31.7%
120−130
−31.7%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+26.4%
110−120
−26.4%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+25.6%
90−95
−25.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%
Valorant 210−220
+25.9%
170−180
−25.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+26%
100−105
−26%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+25%
160−170
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+26.4%
220−230
−26.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+27.8%
90−95
−27.8%
Fortnite 150−160
+31.7%
120−130
−31.7%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+26.4%
110−120
−26.4%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+25.6%
90−95
−25.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+31.8%
110−120
−31.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+30.8%
65−70
−30.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+23%
100−105
−23%
Valorant 210−220
+25.9%
170−180
−25.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+26%
100−105
−26%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+27.8%
90−95
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+26.4%
110−120
−26.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+23%
100−105
−23%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+31.7%
120−130
−31.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+25.5%
200−210
−25.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 88
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
Valorant 240−250
+23.5%
200−210
−23.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+24%
75−80
−24%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+22.9%
70−75
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+25%
80−85
−25%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+32%
50−55
−32%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+24%
75−80
−24%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+26.7%
60−65
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Valorant 210−220
+28.8%
170−180
−28.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+34%
50−55
−34%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%

This is how RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile and RX 7400 compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 30% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 25% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.61 27.40
Recency 19 March 2025 8 August 2025
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 43 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has a 22.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

RX 7400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 4.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7400 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.