Radeon RX 7900M vs RTX A500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A500 with Radeon RX 7900M, including specs and performance data.

RTX A500
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
14.98

RX 7900M outperforms RTX A500 by a whopping 248% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking33241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.8222.95
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2021 (3 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484608
Core clock speed1440 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate113.3601.9
Floating-point processing power7.25 TFLOPS38.52 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs64288
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores1672

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A500 14.98
RX 7900M 52.08
+248%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A500 6693
RX 7900M 23273
+248%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−273%
149
+273%
1440p30−35
−260%
108
+260%
4K21−24
−257%
75
+257%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+0%
139
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 135
+0%
135
+0%
Far Cry 5 128
+0%
128
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+0%
168
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 123
+0%
123
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+0%
116
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how RTX A500 and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 273% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 260% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 257% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.98 52.08
Recency 10 November 2021 19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 180 Watt

RTX A500 has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 7900M, on the other hand, has a 247.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A500 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A500 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5
139 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
66 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A500 or Radeon RX 7900M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.