Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile vs RTX A4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking67not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.40no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA102Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 November 2021 (3 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7168384
Core clock speed1050 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate369.636.00
Floating-point processing power23.65 TFLOPS1.152 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs22424
Tensor Cores224no data
Ray Tracing Cores56no data
L1 Cache7 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount20 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth640.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2021 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 15 Watt

RTX A4500 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Graphics 384SP Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A4500 and Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A4500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 211 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4500 or Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.