RTX A2000 Embedded vs RTX A4500 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4500 Mobile and RTX A2000 Embedded, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A4500 Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 140 Watt
40.02
+50.6%

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Embedded by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking120244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.0158.48
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGA104GA107S
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date22 March 2022 (4 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58882560
Core clock speed930 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1177 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate276.094.16
Floating-point processing power17.66 TFLOPS6.026 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs18480
Tensor Cores18480
Ray Tracing Cores4620
L1 Cache5.8 MB2.5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A4500 Mobile 40.02
+50.6%
RTX A2000 Embedded 26.58

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4500 Mobile 16805
+53.4%
Samples: 429
RTX A2000 Embedded 10954
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+58.6%
140−150
−58.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+58.3%
60−65
−58.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120
+57.1%
70−75
−57.1%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+51.1%
90−95
−51.1%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+58.6%
140−150
−58.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+58.3%
60−65
−58.3%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+51.8%
85−90
−51.8%
Fortnite 170−180
+58.2%
110−120
−58.2%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+56%
100−105
−56%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+58.8%
80−85
−58.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+57%
100−105
−57%
Valorant 230−240
+55.3%
150−160
−55.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+51.1%
90−95
−51.1%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+58.6%
140−150
−58.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+55%
180−190
−55%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+58.3%
60−65
−58.3%
Dota 2 140−150
+53.7%
95−100
−53.7%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+51.8%
85−90
−51.8%
Fortnite 170−180
+58.2%
110−120
−58.2%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+56%
100−105
−56%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+58.8%
80−85
−58.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+56.5%
85−90
−56.5%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+61.7%
60−65
−61.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+57%
100−105
−57%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+53.7%
95−100
−53.7%
Valorant 230−240
+55.3%
150−160
−55.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+51.1%
90−95
−51.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+58.3%
60−65
−58.3%
Dota 2 140−150
+53.7%
95−100
−53.7%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+51.8%
85−90
−51.8%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+56%
100−105
−56%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+57%
100−105
−57%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+53.7%
95−100
−53.7%
Valorant 230−240
+55.3%
150−160
−55.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+58.2%
110−120
−58.2%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+60%
65−70
−60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+57.8%
180−190
−57.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+52.7%
55−60
−52.7%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+59.1%
110−120
−59.1%
Valorant 260−270
+55.3%
170−180
−55.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+58.5%
65−70
−58.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+50.8%
65−70
−50.8%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+56%
75−80
−56%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+56%
50−55
−56%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+54.3%
70−75
−54.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+61.8%
55−60
−61.8%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+62.5%
40−45
−62.5%
Valorant 240−250
+53.8%
160−170
−53.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+62.5%
40−45
−62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Dota 2 110−120
+52%
75−80
−52%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+56%
50−55
−56%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+60%
35−40
−60%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.02 26.58
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 35 Watt

RTX A4500 Mobile has a 51% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A2000 Embedded, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Embedded in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 45 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4500 Mobile or RTX A2000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.