Radeon PRO W6300 vs RTX A4500 Embedded

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4500 Embedded with Radeon PRO W6300, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4500 Embedded
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
28.29
+96.3%

RTX A4500 Embedded outperforms PRO W6300 by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking195358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.4939.92
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5888768
Core clock speed510 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate223.697.92
Floating-point processing power14.31 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs18448
Tensor Cores184no data
Ray Tracing Cores4612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A4500 Embedded 28.29
+96.3%
PRO W6300 14.41

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4500 Embedded 10916
+96.4%
PRO W6300 5559

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.29 14.41
Recency 30 March 2022 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

RTX A4500 Embedded has a 96.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W6300, on the other hand, has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4500 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4500 Embedded is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO W6300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
RTX A4500 Embedded
AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A4500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.