Radeon Pro W6900X vs RTX A4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking56not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.08no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61445120
Core clock speed735 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2150 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate299.5688.0
Floating-point processing power19.17 TFLOPS22.02 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs192320
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores4880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2021 3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 300 Watt

RTX A4000 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Pro W6900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A4000 and Radeon Pro W6900X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4000
RTX A4000
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
Radeon Pro W6900X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 631 vote

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.