Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs RTX A4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking87not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.39no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA104Lucienne
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6144512
Core clock speed735 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate299.560.80
Floating-point processing power19.17 TFLOPS1.946 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs19232
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache6 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2021 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 25 Watt

RTX A4000 has an age advantage of 3 months.

Graphics 512SP Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 460% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A4000 and Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4000
RTX A4000
AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 704 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4000 or Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.