Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs RTX A2000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking140not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation86.10no data
Power efficiency34.79no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA106Lucienne
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3328512
Core clock speed562 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate124.860.80
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS1.946 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs10432
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores26no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 August 2021 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 25 Watt

RTX A2000 has an age advantage of 6 months.

Graphics 512SP Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 180% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A2000 and Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A2000 is a workstation card while Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 576 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 50 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.