Radeon Vega 7 vs RTX A4000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4000 Mobile with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4000 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
33.51
+420%

RTX A4000 Mobile outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 420% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking127544
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Power efficiency23.0211.30
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA104Cezanne
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120448
Core clock speed1140 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate268.853.20
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs808
TMUs16028
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+378%
23
−378%
1440p140−150
+400%
28
−400%
4K90−95
+400%
18
−400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+529%
16−18
−529%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+506%
30−35
−506%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+361%
18
−361%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+529%
16−18
−529%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+354%
28
−354%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+506%
30−35
−506%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+493%
14
−493%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+470%
20
−470%
Fortnite 150−160
+151%
63
−151%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+278%
37
−278%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+371%
24
−371%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+454%
24−27
−454%
Valorant 210−220
+187%
75−80
−187%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+529%
16−18
−529%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+452%
23
−452%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+506%
30−35
−506%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+378%
58
−378%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+730%
10
−730%
Dota 2 140−150
+426%
27−30
−426%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+533%
18
−533%
Fortnite 150−160
+485%
27
−485%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+300%
35
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+438%
21
−438%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+618%
17
−618%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+554%
13
−554%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+526%
23
−526%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+553%
19
−553%
Valorant 210−220
+195%
73
−195%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+505%
21
−505%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+822%
9
−822%
Dota 2 140−150
+426%
27−30
−426%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+533%
18
−533%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+419%
27
−419%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+454%
24−27
−454%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+854%
13
−854%
Valorant 210−220
+760%
25
−760%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+1029%
14
−1029%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+727%
10−12
−727%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+361%
50−55
−361%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+700%
9−10
−700%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+643%
7−8
−643%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+349%
35−40
−349%
Valorant 240−250
+417%
48
−417%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+623%
12−14
−623%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+514%
14−16
−514%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+494%
16−18
−494%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+509%
10−12
−509%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+571%
14−16
−571%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+425%
8−9
−425%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+328%
18−20
−328%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Valorant 220−230
+780%
25
−780%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+850%
6−7
−850%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+425%
8−9
−425%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Dota 2 100−110
+489%
18−20
−489%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+509%
10−12
−509%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+557%
7−8
−557%

This is how RTX A4000 Mobile and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 378% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4000 Mobile is 1550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A4000 Mobile surpassed Vega 7 in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.51 6.44
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 45 Watt

RTX A4000 Mobile has a 420.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 155.6% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Vega 7 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 28 votes

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2446 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4000 Mobile or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.