RTX PRO 6000 vs RTX A400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking372not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.11no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGA107GB202
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76824064
Core clock speed727 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1762 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate42.291,810
Floating-point processing power2.706 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs16176
TMUs24752
Tensor Cores24752
Ray Tracing Cores6188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length163 mm304 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.610.1
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 600 Watt

RTX A400 has 1100% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A400 and RTX PRO 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 27 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A400 or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.