Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs RTX A3000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A3000 Mobile with Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), including specs and performance data.

RTX A3000 Mobile
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
32.50
+634%

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 634% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking171667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency32.03no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA104Raphael
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)26 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096128
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1230 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.4no data
Floating-point processing power10.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
Tensor Cores128no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1375 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A3000 Mobile 32.50
+634%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 4.43

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A3000 Mobile 25990
+759%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 3026

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX A3000 Mobile 71308
+509%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 11703

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A3000 Mobile 19710
+743%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 2338

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A3000 Mobile 29996
+96.7%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 15247

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100
+488%
17
−488%
1440p54
+671%
7−8
−671%
4K47
+683%
6−7
−683%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+433%
12−14
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+756%
9−10
−756%
Elden Ring 110−120
+1010%
10−11
−1010%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+615%
12−14
−615%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+433%
12−14
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+644%
9−10
−644%
Forza Horizon 4 164
+865%
17
−865%
Metro Exodus 103
+930%
10−11
−930%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+379%
14−16
−379%
Valorant 130−140
+1344%
9−10
−1344%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+615%
12−14
−615%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+433%
12−14
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 55
+511%
9−10
−511%
Dota 2 130
+829%
14
−829%
Elden Ring 110−120
+1010%
10−11
−1010%
Far Cry 5 85
+270%
23
−270%
Fortnite 150−160
+481%
24−27
−481%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+1118%
11
−1118%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+786%
14−16
−786%
Metro Exodus 49
+390%
10−11
−390%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+384%
35−40
−384%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+379%
14−16
−379%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+640%
14−16
−640%
Valorant 130−140
+1344%
9−10
−1344%
World of Tanks 270−280
+274%
70−75
−274%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+615%
12−14
−615%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+433%
12−14
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+411%
9−10
−411%
Dota 2 132
+257%
37
−257%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+1167%
9
−1167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+384%
35−40
−384%
Valorant 130−140
+1344%
9−10
−1344%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 62
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
Elden Ring 60−65
+1140%
5−6
−1140%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+483%
30−33
−483%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
World of Tanks 200−210
+553%
30−35
−553%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+950%
6−7
−950%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+600%
4−5
−600%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+920%
10−11
−920%
Forza Horizon 4 86
+1620%
5−6
−1620%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+767%
6−7
−767%
Valorant 95−100
+631%
12−14
−631%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Dota 2 49
+206%
16−18
−206%
Elden Ring 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
+206%
16−18
−206%
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+685%
12−14
−685%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
+206%
16−18
−206%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 77
+381%
16−18
−381%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Fortnite 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Forza Horizon 4 51
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Valorant 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%

This is how RTX A3000 Mobile and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 488% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 671% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 683% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 3550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A3000 Mobile surpassed Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.50 4.43
Recency 12 April 2021 26 September 2022
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm

RTX A3000 Mobile has a 633.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 127 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 254 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.