RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile vs RTX A2000 Embedded

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A1000 Mobile A1000 Mobile 6 GB A2000 Embedded A2000 Max-Q A2000 Max-Q 8 GB A2000 Mobile A2000 Mobile 8 GB A3000 Mobile A3000 Mobile 12 GB A4000 Mobile A5000 Mobile A5500 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
500 Blackwell Embedded 500 Blackwell Mobile 1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 Embedded and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A2000 Embedded
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
26.57

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Embedded by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX A2000 Embedded RTX A2000 Embedded
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking243107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency58.3433.21
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGA107SGB203
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date30 March 2022 (3 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256010496
Core clock speed607 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speed1177 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate94.16551.0
Floating-point processing power6.026 TFLOPS35.27 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs80328
Tensor Cores80328
Ray Tracing Cores2082
L1 Cache2.5 MB10.3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.612.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
−58.9%
143
+58.9%
1440p75−80
−61.3%
121
+61.3%
4K55−60
−58.2%
87
+58.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+0%
160
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 138
+0%
138
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170
+0%
170
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how RTX A2000 Embedded and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 59% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 61% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 58% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 26.57 41.06
Recency 30 March 2022 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

RTX A2000 Embedded has 171.4% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has a 54.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Embedded in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX A2000 Embedded RTX A2000 Embedded
vs
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Embedded
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX A2000 Embedded RTX A2000 Embedded
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 9000) Graphics (Ryzen 9000)
UHD Graphics 48EU UHD Graphics 48EU
vs
RTX 4060 Ti Mobile RTX 4060 Ti Mobile
UHD Graphics 64EU UHD Graphics 64EU
vs
RTX 5060 RTX 5060
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Embedded
vs
L40 CNX L40 CNX
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Embedded
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
RTX A500 Embedded RTX A500 Embedded
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
vs
A10M A10M
R9 390X2 Radeon R9 390X2
vs
520 Mobile GDDR5 Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5
Arc A350M Arc A350M
vs
Go 6600 Go 6600
Arc A350M Arc A350M
vs
Go 6250 Go 6250

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A2000 Embedded or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.