GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs RTX A2000 12 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX A1000 RTX A2000 RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A4000 RTX A4000H RTX A4500 RTX A5000 RTX A5000-8Q RTX A5000-12Q RTX A5500
VS
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 12 GB with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX A2000 12 GB
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
34.25
+90.3%

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking149313
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Cost-effectiveness evaluation95.81no data
Power efficiency34.6028.29
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106GA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 November 2021 (3 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33282048
Core clock speed562 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate124.894.53
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs10464
Tensor Cores104256
Ray Tracing Cores2632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+78.6%
42
−78.6%
1440p60−65
+87.5%
32
−87.5%
4K50−55
+78.6%
28
−78.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.99no data
1440p7.48no data
4K8.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+0%
42
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
+0%
29
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
+0%
68
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 26
+0%
26
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how RTX A2000 12 GB and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 79% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 88% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 79% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.25 18.00
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 45 Watt

RTX A2000 12 GB has a 90.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has 55.6% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
HD 8970M Crossfire Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
vs
Pro Vega II Duo Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Arc A530M Arc A530M
vs
GTX 480 512 480 Core 512
ATI Fire GL3 Fire GL3
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 1650 GDDR6
PRO W7900 AMD PRO W7900
vs
RX 7800 XT 7800 XT
HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics AMD HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
vs
GTS 360M 360M
GT 620M NVIDIA GT 620M
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 1050 Ti Mobile
GTX 570 GeForce GTX 570
vs
GTX 780 Ti GeForce GTX 780 Ti
R9 255 OEM AMD R9 255 OEM
vs
R9 M360 M360
RTX 4050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3090 GeForce RTX 3090
ATI HD 5870 ATI HD 5870
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
GT 820M NVIDIA GT 820M
vs
HD 6550A 6550A

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7
156 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
2562 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A2000 12 GB or GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.