GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs RTX A2000 12 GB
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX A2000 12 GB with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 173 | 337 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 26 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 36.00 | no data |
Power efficiency | 35.63 | 28.93 |
Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
GPU code name | GA106 | GA107 |
Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 November 2021 (3 years ago) | 17 December 2021 (3 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3328 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1185 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1477 MHz |
Number of transistors | 12,000 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 45 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 | 94.53 |
Floating-point processing power | 7.987 TFLOPS | 6.05 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 48 | 32 |
TMUs | 104 | 64 |
Tensor Cores | 104 | 256 |
Ray Tracing Cores | 26 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 167 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
HDMI | - | + |
G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
VR Ready | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
CUDA | 8.6 | 8.6 |
DLSS | + | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 80−85
+90.5%
| 42
−90.5%
|
1440p | 60−65
+87.5%
| 32
−87.5%
|
4K | 50−55
+78.6%
| 28
−78.6%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 5.61 | no data |
1440p | 7.48 | no data |
4K | 8.98 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 74
+0%
|
74
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 47
+0%
|
47
+0%
|
God of War | 43
+0%
|
43
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 67
+0%
|
67
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 42
+0%
|
42
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 59
+0%
|
59
+0%
|
Fortnite | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 62
+0%
|
62
+0%
|
God of War | 48
+0%
|
48
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Valorant | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 29
+0%
|
29
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 118
+0%
|
118
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 53
+0%
|
53
+0%
|
Fortnite | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 53
+0%
|
53
+0%
|
God of War | 37
+0%
|
37
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 68
+0%
|
68
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 58
+0%
|
58
+0%
|
Valorant | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 25
+0%
|
25
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 110
+0%
|
110
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 49
+0%
|
49
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
God of War | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
Valorant | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 37
+0%
|
37
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Valorant | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 37
+0%
|
37
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
God of War | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Valorant | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 34
+0%
|
34
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
God of War | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
This is how RTX A2000 12 GB and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX A2000 12 GB is 90% faster in 1080p
- RTX A2000 12 GB is 88% faster in 1440p
- RTX A2000 12 GB is 79% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 32.71 | 17.07 |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 45 Watt |
RTX A2000 12 GB has a 91.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has 55.6% lower power consumption.
The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.