GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs RTX A1000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A1000 Mobile with GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX A1000 Mobile
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
24.80

RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms RTX A1000 Mobile by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking221124
Place by popularitynot in top-10054
Power efficiency28.3551.41
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482560
Core clock speed630 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1140 MHz1755 MHz
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate72.96140.4
Floating-point processing power4.669 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6480
Tensor Cores6480
Ray Tracing Cores1620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A1000 Mobile 24.80
RTX 4050 Mobile 37.48
+51.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A1000 Mobile 9559
RTX 4050 Mobile 14448
+51.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A1000 Mobile 15135
RTX 4050 Mobile 30465
+101%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX A1000 Mobile 58312
RTX 4050 Mobile 85660
+46.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A1000 Mobile 11321
RTX 4050 Mobile 22400
+97.9%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A1000 Mobile 70880
RTX 4050 Mobile 134084
+89.2%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX A1000 Mobile 4256
RTX 4050 Mobile 8331
+95.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD69
−37.7%
95
+37.7%
1440p27
−70.4%
46
+70.4%
4K18−21
−72.2%
31
+72.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 61
−68.9%
103
+68.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−62.7%
80−85
+62.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
−134%
117
+134%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−68%
120−130
+68%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−68.1%
75−80
+68.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
−66%
83
+66%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−60.4%
85−90
+60.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−59%
95−100
+59%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−39.4%
190−200
+39.4%
Hitman 3 45−50
−80.4%
80−85
+80.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−50.9%
160−170
+50.9%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−58.2%
120−130
+58.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−49.2%
90−95
+49.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−85.7%
140−150
+85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−29.3%
120−130
+29.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−62.7%
80−85
+62.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 33
−179%
92
+179%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−68%
120−130
+68%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−68.1%
75−80
+68.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
−91.9%
71
+91.9%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−60.4%
85−90
+60.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−59%
95−100
+59%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−39.4%
190−200
+39.4%
Hitman 3 45−50
−80.4%
80−85
+80.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−50.9%
160−170
+50.9%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−58.2%
120−130
+58.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−49.2%
90−95
+49.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 87
−93.1%
168
+93.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−62%
80−85
+62%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−29.3%
120−130
+29.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−62.7%
80−85
+62.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 25
−180%
70
+180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−68.1%
75−80
+68.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
−124%
65
+124%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−60.4%
85−90
+60.4%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−39.4%
190−200
+39.4%
Hitman 3 45−50
−80.4%
80−85
+80.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−50.9%
160−170
+50.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 76
−90.8%
145
+90.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
−86%
80
+86%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
−100%
52
+100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−49.2%
90−95
+49.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−75%
40−45
+75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 22
−95.5%
40−45
+95.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−76.9%
45−50
+76.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−157%
36
+157%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−67.9%
220−230
+67.9%
Hitman 3 27−30
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−80.9%
85−90
+80.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−69.8%
70−75
+69.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−71.4%
84
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−111%
59
+111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−45.5%
190−200
+45.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−76.3%
65−70
+76.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−69.6%
35−40
+69.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−83.3%
30−35
+83.3%
Hitman 3 18−20
−77.8%
30−35
+77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−52.1%
180−190
+52.1%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−95.8%
47
+95.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−85.7%
24−27
+85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−92.3%
24−27
+92.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−74.2%
50−55
+74.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−96.3%
53
+96.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−160%
26
+160%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%

This is how RTX A1000 Mobile and RTX 4050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 38% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 70% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 72% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4050 Mobile is 260% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4050 Mobile surpassed RTX A1000 Mobile in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.80 37.48
Recency 30 March 2022 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 4050 Mobile has a 51.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A1000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 87 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2736 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.