RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs RTX A1000 Embedded

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A1000 Embedded A1000 Mobile A1000 Mobile 6 GB A2000 Max-Q 8 GB A2000 Mobile A2000 Mobile 8 GB A3000 Mobile A3000 Mobile 12 GB A4000 Mobile A4500 Mobile A5000 Mobile A5500 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A1000 Embedded and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A1000 Embedded
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
26.02

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms RTX A1000 Embedded by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Embedded
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking246158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency57.6360.43
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGA107SGB206
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date30 March 2022 (3 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483328
Core clock speed630 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1140 MHz1455 MHz
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate72.96151.3
Floating-point processing power4.669 TFLOPS9.684 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs64104
Tensor Cores64104
Ray Tracing Cores1626
L1 Cache2 MB3.3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.612.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
−36.8%
130
+36.8%
1440p50−55
−38%
69
+38%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 88
+0%
88
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RTX A1000 Embedded and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 37% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 38% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 26.02 35.08
Recency 30 March 2022 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

RTX A1000 Embedded has 28.6% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has a 34.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A1000 Embedded in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
RTX A1000 Embedded
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Embedded
vs
Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 48
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Embedded
vs
RTX A2000 Embedded RTX A2000 Embedded
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 2000 Ada Generation
vs
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
RTX 4090 Max-Q 4090 Max-Q
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
RTX 5090 D GeForce RTX 5090 D
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
RTX 5070 Mobile GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
vs
RTX A2000 Embedded RTX A2000 Embedded
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
vs
RTX 4080 RTX 4080
A10M A10M
vs
RTX A5500 RTX A5500
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
vs
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
Arc A350M Arc A350M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.9 27 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A1000 Embedded or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.