RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022
48 GB 8.9, 300 Watt
73.09
+114%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking15142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAda Lovelace
GPU code nameAda Lovelaceno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 December 2022 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,799 no data
Current price$9290 (1.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores181764608
Core clock speed915 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2505 MHzno data
Number of transistors76,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate1,423no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX 6000 Ada Generation and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type8.9GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 bit Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed20000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3no data
CUDA8.9no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 73.09
+114%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 34.12

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+146%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 28847

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by 146% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+78.3%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20571

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by 78% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD194
+116%
90−95
−116%
1440p161
+115%
75−80
−115%
4K118
+115%
55−60
−115%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 240−250
+107%
110−120
−107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 270−280
+109%
120−130
−109%
Battlefield 5 500−550
+113%
230−240
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 250−260
+108%
120−130
−108%
Far Cry 5 250−260
+112%
110−120
−112%
Far Cry New Dawn 350−400
+94.4%
180−190
−94.4%
Forza Horizon 4 450−500
+99.1%
220−230
−99.1%
Hitman 3 260−270
+111%
120−130
−111%
Horizon Zero Dawn 650−700
+110%
300−350
−110%
Metro Exodus 300−310
+107%
140−150
−107%
Red Dead Redemption 2 260−270
+110%
120−130
−110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 700−750
+104%
300−350
−104%
Watch Dogs: Legion 290−300
+110%
130−140
−110%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 240−250
+107%
110−120
−107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 270−280
+109%
120−130
−109%
Battlefield 5 500−550
+113%
230−240
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 250−260
+108%
120−130
−108%
Far Cry 5 250−260
+112%
110−120
−112%
Far Cry New Dawn 350−400
+94.4%
180−190
−94.4%
Forza Horizon 4 450−500
+99.1%
220−230
−99.1%
Hitman 3 260−270
+111%
120−130
−111%
Horizon Zero Dawn 650−700
+110%
300−350
−110%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+100%
55
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 260−270
+110%
120−130
−110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 700−750
+104%
300−350
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1000−1050
+104%
489
−104%
Watch Dogs: Legion 290−300
+110%
130−140
−110%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 240−250
+107%
110−120
−107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 270−280
+109%
120−130
−109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 250−260
+108%
120−130
−108%
Far Cry 5 250−260
+112%
110−120
−112%
Forza Horizon 4 450−500
+99.1%
220−230
−99.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 650−700
+110%
300−350
−110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 700−750
+104%
300−350
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 550−600
+112%
260
−112%
Watch Dogs: Legion 290−300
+110%
130−140
−110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 260−270
+110%
120−130
−110%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 350−400
+111%
160−170
−111%
Far Cry New Dawn 300−310
+108%
140−150
−108%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 180−190
+109%
85−90
−109%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 190−200
+107%
90−95
−107%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 230−240
+111%
100−110
−111%
Far Cry 5 250−260
+112%
118
−112%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+95.5%
170−180
−95.5%
Hitman 3 220−230
+106%
100−110
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 400−450
+112%
180−190
−112%
Metro Exodus 210−220
+112%
99
−112%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 450−500
+112%
210−220
−112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 450−500
+105%
219
−105%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+107%
80−85
−107%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 250−260
+112%
110−120
−112%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+105%
85−90
−105%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+103%
65−70
−103%
Hitman 3 130−140
+100%
65−70
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+102%
173
−102%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 270−280
+111%
128
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 350−400
+90.2%
184
−90.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
+110%
60−65
−110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+107%
55−60
−107%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+112%
50−55
−112%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+100%
50−55
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+114%
130−140
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 240−250
+109%
110−120
−109%
Metro Exodus 200−210
+104%
98
−104%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
+108%
45−50
−108%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 170−180
+110%
80−85
−110%

This is how RTX 6000 Ada Generation and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 116% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 115% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 115% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 73.09 34.12
Recency 3 December 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 115 Watt

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a desktop card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 59 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.