RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile vs RTX 5880 Ada Generation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5880 Ada Generation with RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024
48 GB GDDR6, 285 Watt
59.46
+122%

RTX 5880 Ada Generation outperforms RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking40241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.1659.33
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameAD102GB207
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2024 (1 year ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140801792
Core clock speed975 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed2460 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)285 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1,082141.1
Floating-point processing power69.27 TFLOPS9.032 TFLOPS
ROPs17624
TMUs44056
Tensor Cores44056
Ray Tracing Cores11014
L1 Cache13.8 MB1.8 MB
L2 Cache72 MB24 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount48 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth864.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.912.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+120%
59
−120%
1440p80−85
+111%
38
−111%
4K60−65
+107%
29
−107%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 113
+0%
113
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+0%
59
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how RTX 5880 Ada Generation and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 120% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 111% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 107% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.46 26.80
Recency 5 January 2024 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 285 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 5880 Ada Generation has a 121.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 714.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5880 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
NVIDIA RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 23 votes

Rate RTX 5880 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5880 Ada Generation or RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.