Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
L20 L40 L40 CNX L40G L40S 5000 Ada Generation 5880 Ada Generation 6000 Ada Generation
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation with Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake), including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023
32 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
72.34
+626%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) by a whopping 626% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.28no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameAD102no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date9 August 2023 (2 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280064
Core clock speed1155 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2550 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1,020no data
Floating-point processing power65.28 TFLOPSno data
ROPs176no data
TMUs400no data
Tensor Cores400no data
Ray Tracing Cores100no data
L1 Cache12.5 MBno data
L2 Cache72 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+600%
20
−600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16
+0%
16
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 Ada Generation and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 600% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 72.34 9.96
Recency 9 August 2023 6 January 2025

RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a 626% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
vs
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
vs
RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RX 7600 AMD RX 7600
vs
LP PCI
RX 7600 AMD RX 7600
vs
ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T 9800 X2-256T
RX 7600 AMD RX 7600
vs
ATI Fire GL4 GL4
RX 7600 AMD RX 7600
vs
i752
RX 7600 AMD RX 7600
vs
HD Graphics 6EU 6EU
RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 6000 Blackwell
RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation
vs
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Mobile
PRO W7500 AMD PRO W7500
vs
GeForce 840M 840M
PRO W7500 AMD PRO W7500
vs
HD 6970 6970
PRO W7500 AMD PRO W7500
vs
ATI HD 5770 5770

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 95 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation or Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.