Quadro4 900 XGL vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with Quadro4 900 XGL, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
55.64
+556300%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Quadro4 900 XGL by a whopping 556300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking501581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.61no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameAD103NV25 A2
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)19 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9728no data
Core clock speed1425 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHzno data
Number of transistors45,900 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate643.02.400
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1128
TMUs3048
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MBno data
L2 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz325 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s10.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)8.1
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 55.64
+556300%
Quadro4 900 XGL 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 23269
+581625%
Samples: 332
Quadro4 900 XGL 4
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 55.64 0.01
Recency 21 March 2023 19 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 150 nm

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 556300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 21 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro4 900 XGL in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro4 900 XGL is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Quadro4 900 XGL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 69 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro4 900 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or Quadro4 900 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.