Quadro M4000 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with Quadro M4000, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
56.25
+253%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms M4000 by a whopping 253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.42
Power efficiency35.7310.13
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameAD103GM204
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)29 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$791

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97281664
Core clock speed1425 MHz773 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHzno data
Number of transistors45,900 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate643.080.39
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPS2.573 TFLOPS
ROPs11264
TMUs304104
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MB624 KB
L2 Cache64 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sUp to 192 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
Multi-display synchronizationno dataQuadro Sync

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
High-Performance Video I/O6no data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA8.95.2
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 56.25
+253%
Quadro M4000 15.95

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile Samples: 271 23571
+253%
Quadro M4000 Samples: 1938 6683

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 56.25 15.95
Recency 21 March 2023 29 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 252.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro M4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 63 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 268 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or Quadro M4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.