HD Graphics vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with HD Graphics, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms HD Graphics by a whopping 7633% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 49 | 1227 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 44 |
| Power efficiency | 35.73 | 1.58 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | Generation 7.0 (2012−2013) |
| GPU code name | AD103 | Ivy Bridge GT1 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 21 March 2023 (3 years ago) | 1 April 2012 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 9728 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 1425 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 45,900 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 643.0 | 6.300 |
| Floating-point processing power | 41.15 TFLOPS | 0.1008 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 112 | 1 |
| TMUs | 304 | 6 |
| Tensor Cores | 304 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 8.9 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 55.68 | 0.72 |
| Recency | 21 March 2023 | 1 April 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 7633% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.
HD Graphics, on the other hand, has 243% lower power consumption.
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics in performance tests.
Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while HD Graphics is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
