GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Place in the ranking	31	113
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	19.06	18.15
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	DG2-512	TU104
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	3072
Core clock speed	930 MHz	1365 MHz
Boost clock speed	1680 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	299.5
Floating-point processing power	no data	9.585 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	192
Tensor Cores	no data	384
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	20000 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 62.20
+57.5%

RTX 2080 Super Mobile 39.50

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 51771
+48.4%

RTX 2080 Super Mobile 34876

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 30422
+21.9%

RTX 2080 Super Mobile 24960

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 14861
+44.1%

RTX 2080 Super Mobile 10313

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	210−220 +54.4%	136 −54.4%
1440p	140−150 +48.9%	94 −48.9%
4K	100−110 +49.3%	67 −49.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	104 +0%	104 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	265 +0%	265 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	116 +0%	116 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	121 +0%	121 +0%
Valorant	216 +0%	216 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Dota 2	142 +0%	142 +0%
Far Cry 5	96 +0%	96 +0%
Fortnite	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	217 +0%	217 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	136 +0%	136 +0%
Metro Exodus	92 +0%	92 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	66 +0%	66 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Valorant	127 +0%	127 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +0%	80 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Dota 2	141 +0%	141 +0%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	183 +0%	183 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Valorant	205 +0%	205 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	90 +0%	90 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	90 +0%	90 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	43 +0%	43 +0%
World of Tanks	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	78 +0%	78 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	137 +0%	137 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	90 +0%	90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Valorant	162 +0%	162 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	97 +0%	97 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	97 +0%	97 +0%
Metro Exodus	35 +0%	35 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +0%	28 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	97 +0%	97 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	48 +0%	48 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Dota 2	141 +0%	141 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +0%	78 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Valorant	89 +0%	89 +0%

This is how RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX 2080 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 54% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 49% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 49% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	62.20	39.50
Recency	12 October 2022	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	150 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 57.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.