GeForce GTX TITAN X vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with GeForce GTX TITAN X, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
52.96
+85.2%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms TITAN X by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking51210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.46
Power efficiency35.749.25
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameAD103GM200
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)17 March 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97283072
Core clock speed1425 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz1075 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate643.0209.1
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPS6.691 TFLOPS
ROPs11296
TMUs304192
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MB1.1 MB
L2 Cache64 MB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)no data600 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options-4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s336.5 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GeForce ShadowPlay-+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorks-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA8.95.2
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 52.96
+85.2%
GTX TITAN X 28.59

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 23416
+85.2%
Samples: 296
GTX TITAN X 12641
Samples: 1828

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.96 28.59
Recency 21 March 2023 17 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 85.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX TITAN X in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 68 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 282 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or GeForce GTX TITAN X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.