GeForce GTX 1070 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with GeForce GTX 1070, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
59.17
+76.8%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GTX 1070 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44177
Place by popularitynot in top-10028
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.04
Power efficiency35.6316.12
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameAD103GP104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)10 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97281920
Core clock speed1425 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz1683 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data94 °C
Texture fill rate643.0202.0
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPS6.463 TFLOPS
ROPs11264
TMUs304120
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)no data500 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s256 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data3.0
VR Readyno data+
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA8.9+
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.17
+76.8%
GTX 1070 33.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 23873
+76.9%
GTX 1070 13499

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 51771
+110%
GTX 1070 24652

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 30422
+66.7%
GTX 1070 18255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD200−210
+70.9%
117
−70.9%
1440p120−130
+73.9%
69
−73.9%
4K85−90
+73.5%
49
−73.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.24
1440pno data5.49
4Kno data7.73

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 256
+0%
256
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 129
+0%
129
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 135
+0%
135
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 175
+0%
175
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+0%
111
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 122
+0%
122
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120
+0%
120
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+0%
94
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 81
+0%
81
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+0%
63
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 127
+0%
127
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dead Island 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 79
+0%
79
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+0%
62
+0%
Metro Exodus 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+0%
43
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+0%
52
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35
+0%
35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 39
+0%
39
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and GTX 1070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 71% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 74% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 73% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.17 33.46
Recency 21 March 2023 10 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 76.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1070 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1070 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 57 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9427 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or GeForce GTX 1070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.