GeForce 9600M GS vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with GeForce 9600M GS, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
55.68
+17861%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 9600M GS by a whopping 17861% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking491383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.731.19
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameAD103G96C
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (3 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores972832
Core clock speed1425 MHz103 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHzno data
Number of transistors45,900 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate643.06.880
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPS0.0688 TFLOPS
ROPs1128
TMUs30416
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MBno data
L2 Cache64 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.84.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.91.1
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 55.68
+17861%
9600M GS 0.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 23383
+17887%
Samples: 381
9600M GS 130
Samples: 251

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 26 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 55.68 0.31
Recency 21 March 2023 3 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 20 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 17861% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

9600M GS, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9600M GS is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 72 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 62 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or GeForce 9600M GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.