Arc Graphics 130V vs Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and Arc Graphics 130V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 199 | 406 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 56.11 | no data |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | Xe² |
| GPU code name | AD107 | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 February 2024 (less than a year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 7 |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2025 MHz | 1850 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 18,900 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 129.6 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.294 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | no data |
| TMUs | 64 | no data |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5x |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_2 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
| CUDA | 8.9 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.27 | 11.89 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 129.4% higher aggregate performance score.
Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
