TITAN Ada vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.16no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD104AD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores614418432
Core clock speed720 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate299.51,452
Floating-point processing power19.17 TFLOPS92.9 TFLOPS
ROPs80192
TMUs192576
Tensor Cores192576
Ray Tracing Cores48144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm336 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount20 GB48 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.0 GB/s1.15 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 48 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 800 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 1042.9% lower power consumption.

TITAN Ada, on the other hand, has a 140% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and TITAN Ada. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while TITAN Ada is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIA TITAN Ada
TITAN Ada

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate TITAN Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.