Arc A380M vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.91no data
Power efficiency17.14no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameAD102DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 December 2022 (1 year ago)24 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores181761024
Core clock speed915 MHz1550 MHz
Boost clock speed2505 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1,423128.0
Floating-point processing power91.06 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs19232
TMUs56864
Tensor Cores568128
Ray Tracing Cores1428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-A (3.1)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 December 2022 24 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A380M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 757.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 6000 Ada Generation and Arc A380M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation card while Arc A380M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Intel Arc A380M
Arc A380M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 73 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 8 votes

Rate Arc A380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.