RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 Ada Generation 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 4000 Ada Generation 4000 SFF Ada Generation 4500 Ada Generation 5000 Ada Generation 5880 Ada Generation 6000 Ada Generation
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
500 Blackwell Mobile 1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023
20 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
48.93
+39.5%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking72158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.1960.43
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameAD104GB206
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61443328
Core clock speed720 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1657 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate299.5172.3
Floating-point processing power19.17 TFLOPS11.03 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs192104
Tensor Cores192104
Ray Tracing Cores4826
L1 Cache6 MB3.3 MB
L2 Cache48 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount20 GB8 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.912.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD180−190
+38.5%
130
−38.5%
1440p95−100
+37.7%
69
−37.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 88
+0%
88
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 38% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 38% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 48.93 35.08
Recency 21 March 2023 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 39.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 55.6% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
vs
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
vs
RTX A5500 RTX A5500
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile
vs
RTX 8200 RTX 8200
Apple M4 20-core GPU M4 20 core GPU
vs
RTX A6000 RTX A6000
RTX A400 RTX A400
vs
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4070 Mobile
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
vs
RX 9060 XT Radeon RX 9060 XT
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
vs
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
vs
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
R9 M380 Mac Edition Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
vs
K3100M Quadro K3100M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.4 58 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.