Arc Pro B50 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and Arc Pro B50, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023
20 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
46.68
+56.5%

4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Pro B50 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking73194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.45
Power efficiency53.7234.32
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameAD104BMG-G21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61442048
Core clock speed720 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate299.5332.8
Floating-point processing power19.17 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs192128
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores4816
L1 Cache6 MBno data
L2 Cache48 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length168 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB16 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 46.68
+56.5%
Arc Pro B50 29.82

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20640
+56.5%
Samples: 143
Arc Pro B50 13186
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.68 29.82
Recency 21 March 2023 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 16 GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 56.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro B50 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 57 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.