Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency36.90no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)no data
GPU code nameAD104no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)29 September 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7424no data
Core clock speed1290 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1665 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)110 Wattno data
Texture fill rate386.3no data
Floating-point processing power24.72 TFLOPSno data
ROPs80no data
TMUs232no data
Tensor Cores232no data
Ray Tracing Cores58no data
L1 Cache7.3 MBno data
L2 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 29 September 2025

Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile and Qualcomm Adreno X2-85. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Qualcomm Adreno X2-85
Adreno X2-85

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 32 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile or Qualcomm Adreno X2-85, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.