RTX A400 vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
37.73
+165%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX A400 by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.3021.96
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameAD106GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608768
Core clock speed1395 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate244.142.29
Floating-point processing power15.62 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs14424
Tensor Cores14424
Ray Tracing Cores366
L1 Cache4.5 MBno data
L2 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.6
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 37.73
+165%
RTX A400 14.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 15852
+165%
Samples: 262
RTX A400 5982
Samples: 343

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.73 14.24
Recency 21 March 2023 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 165% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 130% lower power consumption.

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A400 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 11 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 46 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.