Arc Graphics 140V vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 2000 Ada Generation with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024
16 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
45.82
+243%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking73383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation85.03no data
Power efficiency45.31no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameAD107Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28168
Core clock speed1620 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2130 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate187.4no data
Floating-point processing power12 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs88no data
Tensor Cores88no data
Ray Tracing Cores22no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length168 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.82
+243%
Arc Graphics 140V 13.37

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17624
+243%
Arc Graphics 140V 5141

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+225%
40
−225%
1440p65−70
+225%
20
−225%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.99no data
1440p9.98no data

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.82 13.37
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 242.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 28 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.