Radeon RX 7900M vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
36.49

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11933
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda LovelaceRDNA 3
GPU code nameno dataNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30724608
Core clock speedno data1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2090 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)180 Watt (160 - 200 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data601.9

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon RX 7900M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 36.49
RX 7900M 57.64
+58%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 30262
RX 7900M 59943
+98.1%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 98% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 22039
RX 7900M 50241
+128%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 128% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
−61.1%
145
+61.1%
1440p65−70
−63.1%
106
+63.1%
4K45−50
−68.9%
76
+68.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
−48.9%
140−150
+48.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
−51.5%
150−160
+51.5%
Battlefield 5 180−190
−53%
280−290
+53%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−56%
170−180
+56%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−56%
170−180
+56%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
−51.1%
210−220
+51.1%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−57.1%
300−310
+57.1%
Hitman 3 110−120
−51.8%
170−180
+51.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 240−250
−45.2%
350−400
+45.2%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−55.6%
210−220
+55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−53.8%
180−190
+53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 250−260
−57.5%
400−450
+57.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−55.7%
190−200
+55.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
−48.9%
140−150
+48.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
−51.5%
150−160
+51.5%
Battlefield 5 180−190
−53%
280−290
+53%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−56%
170−180
+56%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−56%
170−180
+56%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
−51.1%
210−220
+51.1%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−57.1%
300−310
+57.1%
Hitman 3 110−120
−51.8%
170−180
+51.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 240−250
−45.2%
350−400
+45.2%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−55.6%
210−220
+55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−53.8%
180−190
+53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 250−260
−57.5%
400−450
+57.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
−56.6%
260−270
+56.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−55.7%
190−200
+55.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
−48.9%
140−150
+48.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
−51.5%
150−160
+51.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−56%
170−180
+56%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−56%
170−180
+56%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−57.1%
300−310
+57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 240−250
−45.2%
350−400
+45.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 344
−45.3%
500−550
+45.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
−54.8%
260−270
+54.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−55.7%
190−200
+55.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−53.8%
180−190
+53.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−53.2%
190−200
+53.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
−51.5%
200−210
+51.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−53.8%
140−150
+53.8%
Far Cry 5 123
−54.5%
190−200
+54.5%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−53.8%
200−210
+53.8%
Hitman 3 80−85
−48.1%
120−130
+48.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−53.3%
210−220
+53.3%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−48.5%
150−160
+48.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 249
−40.6%
350−400
+40.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
−54.6%
150−160
+54.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−50%
90−95
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−53.1%
150−160
+53.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−57.4%
85−90
+57.4%
Hitman 3 45−50
−53.1%
75−80
+53.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 76
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
−55.2%
180−190
+55.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−47.7%
65−70
+47.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−57.9%
90−95
+57.9%

This is how RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 61% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 63% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 69% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.49 57.64
Recency 21 March 2023 19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 180 Watt

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 14 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 47 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.