Radeon RX 7400 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking152not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.88no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameAD107Navi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)8 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721792
Core clock speed1635 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate203.0257.6
Floating-point processing power12.99 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs96112
Tensor Cores96no data
Ray Tracing Cores2428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 8 August 2025
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 43 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

RX 7400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 16.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon RX 7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 39 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.