GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile with GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
37.68
+41.5%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 3050 6 GB by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking147237
Place by popularitynot in top-10016
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data71.67
Power efficiency54.5027.50
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAD107GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)2 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722304
Core clock speed1635 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate203.0105.8
Floating-point processing power12.99 TFLOPS6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs9672
Tensor Cores9672
Ray Tracing Cores2418

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.6
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37.68
+41.5%
RTX 3050 6 GB 26.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15200
+41.5%
RTX 3050 6 GB 10741

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.68 26.62
Recency 21 March 2023 2 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 41.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 33 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2066 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile or GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.