Arc A370M vs RSX Reality Synthesizer

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated428
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.58
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRSX-CXD5302DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 October 2012 (12 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors302 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate13.2099.20
Floating-point processing powerno data3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLES 1.14.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2012 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

Arc A370M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RSX Reality Synthesizer and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RSX Reality Synthesizer is a desktop graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer
RSX Reality Synthesizer
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 32 votes

Rate RSX Reality Synthesizer on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 187 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RSX Reality Synthesizer or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.