Quadro K620 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Place in the ranking	416	596
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	2.58
Power efficiency	19.76	8.85
Architecture	no data	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	no data	GM107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	no data	22 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$189.89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	384
Core clock speed	no data	1058 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1124 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	41 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	26.98
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.8632 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	160 mm
Width	no data	1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR5x	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8448 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	Up to 29 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	no data	4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Desktop Management	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.5
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.1.126
CUDA	-	5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

37
+106%

18−20

−106%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

10.55

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.49	5.79
Chip lithography	4 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	41 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has a 98.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 2.5% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is a notebook card while Quadro K620 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.